Cal State LA has maintained institutional accreditation since 1953 and has participated in periodic reviews throughout its history. This section provides an overview of the University’s accreditation history, major milestones, and the processes associated with reaffirmation and other WSCUC reviews.
The milestones below highlight key developments in the University’s recent accreditation history.
| Year | Milestone |
|---|---|
| 1953 | Initial accreditation |
| 2011 | *Accreditation reaffirmed |
| 2018 | Institutional Report submitted |
| 2019 | WSCUC accreditation visit and reaffirmation |
| 2024 | Interim Report Submitted to WSCUC |
*Cal State LA was subsequently reaccredited in 1960, 1965, 1970, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1999, 2011, and 2019.
Recent Accreditation Timeline
- Winter 2007 — Institutional Self-Study approved
- Spring 2009 — Capacity and Preparatory Review Visit
- Fall 2010 — Educational Effectiveness Review
- Spring 2011 — Interim Progress Report Review and reaffirmation
- Spring 2014 — WASC Annual Report
- Spring 2015 — Mid-Cycle Review
- Spring 2016 — WSCUC Annual Report
- Fall 2016 — semester calendar launch
- Spring 2017 — Offsite Review report preparation
- June 28, 2018 — Institutional Report submitted
- September 6, 2018 — Offsite Review
- February 27–March 1, 2019 — Accreditation Visit
- July 2019 — Commission reaffirmed accreditation for 10 years
- March 2024 — Interim Report submitted to WSCUC
- June 2024 — Interim Report Action Summary
How the WSCUC Review Process Works
WSCUC accreditation review is a multi-year process that typically includes institutional self-study, preparation of an Institutional Report, an Offsite Review, a campus visit by a peer review team, and consideration by the Commission. Additional reviews and reports may be required between comprehensive reaffirmation cycles.
Simplified Stages of the WSCUC Review Process
The following stages provide a simplified overview of the WSCUC accreditation review process. While the specific activities, documentation, and timelines may vary depending on the type and cycle of review, these stages illustrate the general progression from institutional preparation through Commission action.
- Prepare: Self-review, evidence gathering, campus engagement
- Report: Institutional Report and supporting documentation
- Review: Offsite Review and accreditation visit
- Commission Action: Commission decision and follow-up requirements