TCM Table of Contents – Classroom
Management Resources – School
Climate – John
Shindler – TCM Workshops
From Transformative Classroom Management. By
John Shindler. ©2009
Reproduction is
unlawful without permission
In this Chapter
·
What
are Social and Communal Bonds?
·
What
is a Social Contract?
·
Steps
in Implementing the Social Contact
This chapter explores the nature of social
and communal bonds. It is the first of three chapters dealing with the
practical and theoretical issues related to creating and maintaining an
effective “social contract” and provides a step-by-step process for developing
a working classroom social contract.
Many teachers today want to create what could
be characterized as a “democratic” classroom. Others aspire to have classrooms
that function as “learning communities.” This trend toward seeking classroom
structures that endeavor to empower students rather than simply control them is
an encouraging development. The good news for these teachers is that over time
and with effective leadership, any class can be a functional democratic
society. And with a little more time and a clear understanding of what it takes
to empower students to value and commit to the common good of the group, any
class can begin to take on the characteristics of a community. Both will
require a great deal of awareness of what is standing in the way of one’s
success, and a dedicated intention and commitment to doing what it takes to
make it happen.
Social bonds or social contracts are explicit and implicit agreements
made between individuals in any group to help clarify what they should expect
from one another (Sheff, 1997). The group can be as small as two people or as
big as the population of a country or, of course, even the planet. For example,
we enter into an agreement with our governments in which we pay some taxes and
can expect some services in return. Likewise, when we walk down the street we
have some confidence that others will refrain from harming us if we refrain
from harming them. In these examples, the agreements are fairly clear; however,
there are times when what it means to fulfill our part of the bargain or what
behavior constitutes violating the social contract can be more ambiguous.
As we know from living in a modern society, laws do not guarantee that
citizens treat one another fairly or act as good democratic participants. In
fact, laws are just the beginning of creating what could be called a
well-functioning democratic society. This is also true in the classroom. Rules
do not make a democratic classroom, no matter how well the teacher enforces
them. A democracy is more. At the heart of a working democracy are
well-defined, collectively owned social bonds. Social bonds include both
implicit and explicit agreements among the members of the collective that
create mutual understanding and trust. The intentional development of a social
contract (also called a behavioral covenant, or bill or rights) can help
clarify those agreements. A
well-functioning social contract both promotes a well-managed class and
provides students with an invaluable education in democratic participation.
What are Communal Bonds?
Whereas social bonds answers such questions as, “What must I do to fulfill
my part of the (social) contract?” communal bonds answer the question, “What
can I do to make the collective better?” Societal bonds are at the root of what
make most of our daily interactions smooth and reasonable. Communal bonds more
often reflect friend and family relationships and are at the root of why we
feel part of something greater than ourselves (Scott, 1988). It is difficult to
have sustainable communal bonds without well-functioning social bonds in place.
As you begin to develop your vision for your ideal classroom and management
style, clarifying what kinds of bonds you want operating in your classroom is
useful. Social bonds are essential for any 1- or 2-Style classroom to create a
sense of safety, clearness, and efficiency. But to achieve more substantive
levels of group cohesion, a high functioning 1-Style classroom, and what we
refer to as transformative outcomes, we need to foster communal bonds among our
students. In this chapter we will focus primarily on how we create the kind of well-functioning
social bonds that are required for a successful democratic society and return
to the idea of community later in Chapter 15.
Chapter
Reflection 8-a: In your estimate, what proportion of classes that
you observe would you characterize as democratic? How many would you describe
as true learning communities?
What is a Classroom Social Contract?
At minimum a classroom social contract
outlines how each group member will keep from infringing on the rights of the
others (Curwin & Mendler, 1986; MacNeil, 1980). A more empowering social
contract will outline what members can do to promote improvement for themselves
and their class. The contract classroom exists as a set of rules, principles,
boundaries, expectations and consequences that govern the concrete document and
abstract concept. It is preferable to write the concrete aspects of the
contract as clearly, simply, and positively as possible. The power of the
contract will depend on one’s translation of the abstract aspects of the
contract into practical, accessible operational ideas and behaviors (Elias
& Schwab, 2003).
Rules exist as words on paper or a whiteboard
and remain “just words,” never becoming meaningful; until they become a
concrete and material part of the students’ lived experience, they will have
little influence on behavior. For those of us (especially the more
practical-minded sensates, see Appendix B) who tend to have great affection for
rules and legalistic thinking, it is critical to shift our focus from the rule
as written law to rules as values implying a larger purpose.
In the same way, principles can remain mere
abstractions and noble concepts that are never translated into action. Those of
us (especially the more abstract minded intuitives, see Appendix B) must
continuously help our students understand how the concepts that seem so clear
to us can be applied and what they look like in practical behavior. Our
discussion of expectations (Chapter 4) should be useful in assisting in
formulating concrete strategies for translating your abstract desires into
tangible behavioral expectations that are clear to students.
A social contract can begin as a document;
while useful, the written document is not
the contract. The social contract exists to the degree to which the
stakeholders (teachers, students and assistants) understand and commit to it
(MacNeil, 1980). The knowledge component is foundational; one cannot commit to
something that one does not know or understand. Likewise, if you do not commit
to what you have ceremonially agreed to, you are not fulfilling your role and
consequently the social contract does not truly exist. Moreover, if the
contract exists only in your head and not in your students’ it does not exist.
Finally--and this point can not be emphasized too strongly--if the students
view you as (externally) imposing the rules on them, the contract loses power
as well as effectiveness. If the students see the ownership of the social contract
as (internal) theirs it will be powerful and effective. In other words, to the
degree that it exists within the hearts and minds of students and not as an
imposition from the teacher, the contract exists.
Implementing a social contract involves a
great deal more than explaining the classroom rules. The social contract
functions to the degree that it is meaningful, internalized, and committed to
by the students. It will be internalized and invested in much more if students
feel a sense of ownership (Brophy & McCaslin, 1992). For that reason it
makes sense to have students involved in creating the class rules, as well as
the consequences of breaking rules. If you find yourself uncomfortable with the
idea of students taking an active role in this process you might discuss the
rationale behind your thinking with them, and if possible involve them in
problem-solving any necessary modifications as the contract evolves.
Chapter
Reflection 8-c: Recall a situation in which you were involved
in the creation of a set of guiding principles. How did it affect how you felt
about the value of the principles?
We need terms to express what we will refer
to as the basic tenets of our contract. While
what we call the basic tenets of our agreement are ultimately a matter
of semantics, on the other hand, each of the assortment of possible options for
these basic terms implies a somewhat different meaning. We should make a choice
of terms that best represents the kind of thinking we want to define our
contract. Here is a list of the most common terms and their common meanings:
It is certainly reasonable to consider using a combination of terms,
such as Rules, Bill of Rights and/or
Principles for the few global pillars of the contract, Procedures for the operational processes that we need to have in
place to help the class function smoothly, and Expectations for the countless occasions where a shared
understanding of “what to do, and how to act” needs to be in place.
Chapter
Reflection 8-d: What do you think of when you hear the terms
listed above? What are your associations with each term? What would you guess
your students associate with each?
Step
2: Develop your list of basic tenets/expectations (or rules, principles, or
boundaries, etc.)
No matter how organic, negotiated or flexible
your vision of your social contract, you will need some concrete pillars to
anchor the broader contract. These rules, bill of rights, expectations,
policies, or boundaries should be reduced to writing and made visible to all
members of the classroom society. Keeping in mind these two suggestions that
will help you down the road. First, make the list as short as possible; three
to five items are best (Doyle, 2003; Emmer & Evertson, & Anderson,
1980). Too many rules are difficult to remember and have the effect of making
each item less powerful as more items are added (Emmer & Evertson, &
Anderson, 1980). Second, they should be stated positively (Thorson, 2003). Our
unconscious minds can only understand positive messages. So if an items states,
“Do not talk when others are talking,” it sends a confusing message to the
unconscious. Moreover, stating expectations negatively can have the effect of
encouraging negative behavior. Restating the rule into positive terms eases the
unconscious conflict and clarifies the expectation. A more effective alternate
phrasing would be something such as, “Be attentive to those who are speaking
and expect others to be attentive when you are speaking.”
Chapter Reflection 8-e: Consider
times in your life when you were involved in creating a group plan. How did it
affect your level of buy-in and investment in the outcome? Compare those cases
with those in which a set of rules was imposed upon you. In which situation did
you find yourself being most respectful of the rules? What do your conclusions
suggest about the value of including your students in this stage of the
process?
Depending on the age of the students you will
need to guide the process accordingly. If they are very young (grades K-3), you
might want to primarily use questions. For example you might ask, “What kinds
of things would you say are important for all students to do, if we are going
to have a good class?” And then as you hear responses, you might pick those
that are getting at the most important areas and paraphrase them for the
approval of the whole group. For example, a student might offer the idea, “We
should not hit each other.” Let’s assume that the idea identified a useful
principle. To validate the student and achieve consensus one might respond by
saying, “What do you all think? Should one of our four rules be ‘we keep our
hands to ourselves and respect each other’s space’? That rule would include not
hitting, what do you think? Raise your hand if you want me to write that as one
of our rules.” As you can observe, if we undertake the process in this fashion,
we are able to maintain as much control of the outcome as we need to feel
confident in the results of the process, but it is genuinely collaborative.
If our students are older (grades 4-12), we
might begin by placing students in groups and then prompt them to generate two
or three basic expectations for the class. If we have been using
concept-building exercises previously, we can initiate the exercise in a
familiar manner. In essence, we are asking our students to generate examples
for the following overarching concept – things that all students can do,
that if we each did them, the class would function well and grow as a
collective. They will need to be reminded that their ideas should be stated
positively. As the students come up with their ideas we can list them on the
board or an overhead projector. We might take the opportunity to add items that
we feel are critical and are not already on the list. Students are rarely
offended if we think of things that they had forgotten. After all ideas have
been recorded, the next step is to work with the students to find the 3-5
themes that emerge from the list. After the themes have been developed, we
(with or without the help of the students, depending on your preference) can
take each theme and synthesize it into a concise phrase. If we do it alone the
phrasing may be a little better, but if the students take this on it will
likely lead to another elevation of their level of ownership for the process.
One idea for including the students at this stage of the process is to give
each group one of the themes and have them work with it until they come up with
an acceptable phrase. In the end, a majority of the class must approve each
phrase that is submitted.
Chapter
Reflection 8-f: Students with experience performing concept
attainment exercises will be much more effective when it is time to work with
the social contract. This strategy is described briefly in chapter 13, but
helping your students become experts in concept attainment will have a
“transformative” effect on many areas of the class experience.
As we will discuss in more detail in the next
chapter, developing clear, logical and related consequences for contract
violations is essential to the success of any social contract (Brady, et, al,
2003; Elias & Schwab, 2003). Even though the two terms are used
interchangeably by many, there is a significant difference between what
constitutes a consequence and what constitutes a punishment (Elias &
Schwab, 2003). Logical and related consequences help students foster cause-and-effect
relationships between their thoughts and actions and the outcomes of those
thoughts and actions. These lessons lead to ever-increasing levels of
responsibility, and promote the students’ internal locus of control.
Punishments lead to obedience at best, and more often to resentment and
hostility. Few meaningful lessons are learned from punishments and their use
degrades the quality of the contract. Punishments externalize the causality of
the event as the students associate the interventions with pleasing or
displeasing the teacher rather than with the choices they made.
Developing consequences as a class is an
excellent way to promote higher levels of ownership and understanding. It will take
time to help them understand the difference between punishments and
consequences, but it is a useful distinction to make. In addition, it will help
clarify the nature and purpose of the social contract. Using the exercise
involving the student missing the bus in the following chapter would be a
useful place to start. The degree to which you have students involved in the
development process is up to you. However, keep in mind the trade-off. We want
to maintain a sense of coherence and vision to the contract. That will come
primarily from your ability to support ideas and outcomes that integrate well
as a whole. Then again, more student involvement usually translates into more
empowerment and buy-in.
If we want to support student involvement, we
might want to use an inductive process to accomplish this. For instance, we
might ask the students questions, then brainstorm ideas for the common problems
the class might face. It is best to be proactive rather than reactive when
doing this. For example, consider a case where a student begins to abuse the
use of the pencil sharpener. If we raise the issue to the class as a whole
after the event, the issue will be associated with the student and our
discussion will feel like public shaming to that student. If possible, we
should anticipate the problem and have the discussion before the problem comes
up. To be effective, consequences have to be well understood and in place
before we can hold students accountable for them. Until then, we can use
warnings. But use warnings as infrequently as possible. They weaken the
cause-and-effect in the contract.
Take the case of the class where the students
begin to request going to the restroom more often than we feel they should, and
we determine that it is hurting the class as a result. We might take the
opportunity to brainstorm a policy with the students on how to solve “our”
problem. If we want to guide the process toward what we feel is a sound idea,
we can begin by offering a plan for them to evaluate and approve. Or we can
have students choose an idea from those that they generated themselves. But
once the class has voted a policy into place, we can make an assumption about
the level of understanding and ownership they will have toward that policy. So
when that expectation is raised in whatever form, it will not come out of left
field, or feel imposed.
With very young students, we will need to
provide a greater amount of assistance in the consequence development process,
but it can still be a useful exercise. The very young student can have
difficulty recognizing an appropriate level of severity and can tend to think
in terms of punishment. They will struggle with the notion that the
consequences need to be logical and related. They will also abstract themselves
from the possible misbehavior. They often struggle to conceive that they may be
the ones violating the social contract. As a result, when we ask for ideas from
this age student, we are often surprised at what they come up with. We might
ask, “What should we do if someone comes back from recess late?” We might get a
response such as “They should be spanked,” or, “They should have to stay after
school.” Again, it may be wise to offer alternatives and have students select
from among them. This will promote ownership while supporting an outcome
everyone can better accept.
When a policy, rule or consequence is not
working well, it represents an opportunity to improve the social contract, as
well as to provide the students with the opportunity to engage in a democratic
decision-making exercise. Students of any age can successfully participate in a
class meeting, if it is well organized. We will discuss class meetings
and their benefits in more detail in Chapter 15, but they will have value to the
extent that they are well structured, effectively led, and that students take
them seriously. Here are some basic guidelines for an effective class meeting:
Students should feel free to suggest to you
(privately is best) that the class is in need of a class meeting to resolve a
pressing problem. You may not feel every request is worthy of a class meeting.
But the more this process is generated by the students and results in an
increased sense of justice and mutual respect, the more it will strengthen the
social contract. For those who are inclined toward 1-Style management approach,
a useful goal will be to make yourself redundant in the process as the students
learn to take an ever-increasing degree of control over the process.
Step 4: Make the social contract as
conspicuous as possible
The initial process of creating the basic rules, expectations and
consequences for contract violations should happen as soon as possible in the
term. And once it is in place, the social contract has a genesis. But it will
fade in memory if it does not become a living document. It will need to evolve
to meet the needs of its stakeholders and grow as the collective grows in
maturity, since any social contract will exist only in the collective
understanding of the participants. This understanding begins with familiarity.
One idea is to use phrases from your contract as banners within the class. For
example, “This class is built on respect,” or “Attitudes become actions.” Take
advantage of the walls of your classroom. Student are bombarded by thousands of
visual images each day, why not make the ones in your class empowering?
Chapter Reflection
8-g: What creative ways have you seen teachers use
the walls of the classroom to promote the expectations of their class?
For grades two and up, one option is to send
a copy of the contract home with each student and have each parent and the student
sign it, signifying that they have read and understood it. This practice can
have many benefits. First, it provides an opportunity for families to read your
social contract, promoting their understanding of what you are trying to
accomplish and their appreciation that your discipline system is proactive and
positive. Second, it allows you to refer to the fact that the student signed
the contract. This may be valuable when they feel tempted to distance
themselves from their agreement.
To promote understanding of the written content of your social contract,
it can be a very effective strategy to take time to discuss it and then quiz
the students on it. This may sound odd, but the investment of time will be paid
back many times in improved behavior later. Why not expect the students to pass
the social contract contents quiz before they are able to enjoy the privilege
of taking part in the other aspects of the class? It may be as simple as
requiring that the students are able to list the class rules, and requiring a
100% score before they are allowed to use a specified piece of classroom
equipment (e.g., a computer, gym equipment, lab materials, puzzles, library
books). However, only use the idea of a quiz if you judge that the students
need help buying into the social contract.
While the written word can be a powerful tool
in promoting a social contract, a good number of very effective social
contracts exist almost entirely on an implicit level--as shared understandings
between the teacher and the students. This is possible because the majority of
the means by which the social contract is communicated are through
teacher-student interactions. Recall the discussion of classroom expectations
in Chapter 4. Students will respond to the degree that an expectation is clear
and associated positively. Therefore, we need to promote our social contract
with effective methods and avoid ineffective methods. Beginning with the most
effective methods (as outlined in Chapter 4), let’s examine how each technique
can be used to promote the strength of one’s social contract.
Purposeful Action:
The most defining factor in the development and implementation of the social
contract will be the degree to which the teacher is consistent, clear, and
follows through. This idea will be explored in depth in Chapter 10.
Positive Recognitions:
“I just want to recognize how respectful and supportive you each are to the
person presenting. How does it feel to be in a class that is so respectful of
one another?” Let the students know it when they are behaving in a way that is
promoting the social contract and the common good.
Clarifying Statements:
“We all have our full attention on Phang right now, and we are listening for
some of the key details that he included in his story.” This is a powerful way
to remind the student of expectations without being negative or lecturing them.
Mantras: “In this
class, we raise our hands before we speak,” or “In this class, there are only
hard working, intelligent students.” Mantras are words that can translate into
actions eventually. Even if they are far from a realistic assessment at first,
they will become actualized over time.
Clarifying Questions:
“What is the consequence if we do not finish our work during class?” or “What
is the expectation when we are at the computer?” These help the students recall
the aspect of the social contract without being told. They engender
accountability and self-reflection.
Warnings: Use when
an expectation, rule, policy or consequence is new and unfamiliar; after that
they only weaken the cause-and-effect relationship that gives the social
contract much of its power.
Negative recognitions, lectures, put-downs, punishments, personal
praise, and public shaming all weaken the contract and undermine the
relationship between the teacher and the students. This idea will be discussed
further as we examine the use of punishments in the next chapter.
Chapter
Reflection 8-h: Recall a class where there were few if any
rules, but all the students seemed to be on the same page. How was this
accomplished? Examine the list of methods above. Did the teacher use any of
these to help support a shared understanding in the class?
I ___(student’s
name)________, a member in the class of ____(teacher and school)______,
hereby commit to being a responsible member of the class, and doing what it
takes to learn, grow, and help others learn and grow.
I have been
part of our collective process for creating our Social Contract on ________. I
understand and commit to the following rules:
We respect
one another. This is shown in our 100% attention and
listening. In raising our hands to speak. Being considerate to the needs of
others. In saying only positive things to others in the class.
We are
responsible. This is shown in our preparedness. It is
shown in the choices that we make. We do our part to make the class a better
place.
We do our
best. This is shown in making a consistently
excellent effort all day long. We do our best when things are easy and when
they are difficult. We persist even when we are tempted to quit, either on
ourselves or on others.
I understand
that my role in the social contract is to live up to my agreement, accept
consequences when I do not, and continue to work to become a more responsible
person and contributor to the class. I understand it is my obligation to know
the expectations and consequences that have been developed by the class and
teacher. I understand that I have a right to voice my opinion about any rule,
expectation or consequence at any time. But I do accept that once they have
been established, it is my responsibility to be accountable to them, or accept
the consequences.
By my actions
and my signature below, I hereby commit to doing my best to fulfill my
responsibility to the class and our social contract.
__________________________________ _____________________
Student
Signature Date
__________________________________ _____________________
Parent or
Guardian Signature (optional) Date
If a procedure needs to be improved, practice
it. If the social contract requires a new set of skills, teach and model them.
To promote a practical understanding of the contract, make the implicit aspects
more explicit. If your contract has words such as respect, responsibility,
attention, attitude, cooperation, effort, encouragement, etc, (and it is
desirable that it would), you must make those abstractions concrete and
personal, or they will remain abstractions (Hickey & Schafer, 2003). So
use practical behavior to help students inductively master the conceptual
realities. As discussed above, positive recognitions of behavior are both
concrete and personal. They teach concepts fast, if we help students recognize
the connection. For example, after an activity we might say, “Our goal was to
take care of our materials so that they would last; I see that they are still
all here and in great shape. That kind of responsible behavior tells me I can
trust you to go out and get more materials.” Or “I notice that each of the
members of this group have waited their turn to speak, that is a great example
of respect.” We will want to use mantras, clarifying statements and clarifying
questions in the same way.
How you deal with contract violations will have the most
significant effect on the integrity of the social contract. When we observe
behavior that violates the agreement, we have three choices. Only one is
helpful. The other two will quickly undermine the integrity of the contract. If
we take action, follow through and hold the students accountable, the contract
is shown to have efficacy and integrity. If we ignore the behavior, or if we
“go negative” (e.g., become disappointed, shame the student, recognize the
behavior publicly, etc.) it shows the contract to be weak and randomly applied.
When it is inconsistently applied, it becomes about the teacher (the external
locus of control) and less about the choice of the student (internal locus of
control), and therefore loses power.

Chapter
Reflection 8-i: Recall the social learning model, what does
it imply about the importance of consistency?
The roles of the teacher and students within
the social contract may appear obvious. However, you might be surprised at how
much students vary in their view of their roles in the contract and what they
view as your role. Depending on the style of leader you desire to be, you will
need to remind the students what your role is, what it is not, what their roles are and what they are not. Students will
likely bring in a composite of the roles that they adopted from past classes
and their home life. Likewise, they will assign you a role that mirrors that
which they have experienced from others. Again, don’t stay in thoughts of
disappointment or insult. Be proactive. Continuously clarify the roles within
the social contract. This will be an ongoing process. It will require public
reminders such as, “I am not going to come and fix the problems in your groups.
You will need to work out your disagreements on your own.” And private
encounters: “Etienne, it is your responsibility to bring the necessary
materials.” The social contract will work best if you take a facilitator role.
Avoid being the judge, the police, or and passive shopkeeper. The importance of
this will be reinforced in the following chapters.
As the expectations become more familiar and concrete to students, you
can begin to use language that tests the degree to which the expectations have
been internalized. For instance, if the behavior related to what defines the
concept a “ready” group has been internalized by students, one only need refer
to the term. In this case, we might say, “I am looking for the groups that are
ready.” If we observe groups demonstrating “ready group” behavior, we know that
the students grasp it. If they do not, we know it is time to clarify the
concept a bit further and then assess the expectation later to see if it has
been internalized yet. Again, clarifying questions are helpful in assisting the
students from the learning stage to the performance stage. For example, instead
of saying to the class, “Class, please say hello to our Principal, Mr.
Maroufi,” we might simply ask the class, “How do we greet a guest in our
class?”
Chapter
Reflection 8-j: Recall the analogy we used in Chapter 6,
referring to instructions as giving a fish, and clarifying questions as
teaching to fish. Can you see the differential effect of the two strategies in
the process of supporting the internalization of our social contract?
The social bonds among the members of the
class will become stronger if they are supported by communal bonds.
Fundamentally, a basic social contract does not require the need for
interdependence and/or a commitment on the part of the students to the common
good, yet building those qualities into the logic of the overall contract will
bring an added level of vitality to the classroom relationships. Applying the
following three principles will go a long way in promoting the communal bonds
in your class:
Each of these ideas is examined in more
detail in Chapter 15.

![]()
![]()
No matter if your preference is for a more
teacher-centered class (2-Style orientation) or a more student-centered class
(1-Style orientation), your contract will become stronger to the degree that the
ownership of it resides with the students rather than the teacher. If the
students come to view the contract as something that you are imposing upon
them, it will have a limited effect. However, if they view the contract as
something that functions to make their class more effective and more
emotionally safe and they appreciate the feeling of responsibility that it
promotes, it will grow in efficacy and integrity.
To help promote ownership of the contract it
is useful to gradually shift the focus of your language from the kinds of
expected behavior to the value for one’s self and the group when that behavior
is exhibited. Especially if you are interested in developing a 1-Style
classroom, helping students appreciate the values of consideration, self-discipline,
and personal responsibility are critical to promoting a living and internalized
social contract and will lead naturally into the development of communal bonds.
We will discuss the pathway to a 1-Style classroom and how to build a community
upon the foundation of the social contract in Chapter 15.
Insert as
dialogue box to the right
Transformative
Idea:
After reading Chapter 20, you may
recognize the value of assessing the quality of student participation or
process in your class. This technique can have a powerful effect on student
behavior as it helps to clarify and reward what it means to demonstrate a high
quality investment. It can work synergistically with the class’s social
contract. Whereas the social contract can clarify high quality behavior and
address behavioral problems, assessing the quality of behavior can have the
effect of improving it.
CONCLUSION
A sound social contract makes our shared classroom expectations more
concrete and observable. It has the further transformative effect of preparing
our students to be active democratic citizens. In the next chapter, we will
explore the importance of developing logical and related consequences for
social contract violations, and helpful guidelines for doing so. In Chapter 10
we discuss steps for effectively implementing the consequences of our social
contract.
Journal Reflections
1. Do you want your expectations and social
contract to come mostly from you or from your students? Why?
2. Discuss your thoughts about the following
terms -- rules, principles and expectations. In your class, which of these will
be more prominent? Why?
Class Activities:
1.
In groups, discuss your feelings related to the use of student input in
the creation of the social contract. Do you feel that it is worth the effort
and loss of control over the outcome?
2.
In groups, take 5-10 minutes to independently brainstorm some of the
rules and expectations that you would include in the social contract section of
your classroom management plan. What terms are you going to use to describe the
ingredients? Share your ideas with one another. Sharing your classroom
management plan ideas with others will help you: 1) get more ideas and 2)
clarify and strengthen your own ideas as you have to explain and/or defend them
to others.
3.
Develop a social contract for a hypothetical class or one that you are
teaching.
REFERENCES
Bluestein, J. (1999) 21st Century Discipline: Teaching Students Responsibility and Self-management.
Fearon Teaching Aides
Brady, K., Forton, M.B., Porter, D., & Wood, C. (2003) Rules in school. Greenfield, MA:
Northeast Foundation for Children.
Brophy, J.E. & McCaslin, M. (1992). Teachers’ reports of how they
perceive and cope with problem students. Elementary School Journal, 93, 2-68.
Curwin,
R., and Mendler, A. (1986) Discipline
with Dignity. Alexandria VA: Association Supervision and Curriculum
Development Press.
Doyle, W. (2006) Ecological Approaches to classroom management. . In C.M. Evertson
& C.S. Weinstein, (Eds.) Handbook of
classroom management. (p. 97-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Elias,
M.J., & Schwab, Y. (2006) From compliance to responsibility: Social and
emotional learning and classroom management. In C.M. Evertson & C.S.
Weinstein, (Eds.) Handbook of classroom
management. (pp. 309-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emmer,
E.T., Evertson, C.M., & Anderson, L. (1980) Effective Classroom management
at the beginning of the school year. Elementary
School Journal, 80, 219-230.
Hickey,
D.T., & Schafer, N.J. (2006) Design-based, participation-centered
approaches to classroom management. In C.M. Evertson & C.S. Weinstein,
(Eds.) Handbook of classroom management.
(pp. 281-308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacNeil,
I.R. (1980) The new social contract: an inquiry into
modern contractual relations.
Cambridge: Yale University Press
Scheff, T. J. (1997) Emotions,
the Social Bond, and Human Reality: Part/Whole Analysis, Port Chester, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
Thorson,
S.A. (2003) Listening to students:
Reflections on secondary classroom management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.