Classroom Management Resource Page      Shindler      School Climate      PLSI       Teaching   -    Workshops by JVS

 

Chapter 17: The Transformative Classroom: Implementing a One-Style Approach and Creating a Classroom Community

From Transformative Classroom Management. By John Shindler. ©2008

Reproduction is unlawful without permission

 

Partial Chapter Text Only

 

In this Chapter

·         The 1-Style Classroom as the “Natural State

·         Defining Community

·         Stages of Development for the Transformative Classroom

o        Stage 1 - Foundation

§         Management Goals - Clarity and Intention

§         Community Development Goals – Safety and Belonging

o        Stage 2 – Transition

§         Management Goals - Shifting Locus of Ownership and Cultivating Intrinsic Motivation

§         Community Development Goals - Creating Identity and Group Accomplishment

o        Stage 3 - Encouragement

§         Management Goals – Facilitating Vision and Self Direction

§         Community Development Goals - Fostering a Cause Beyond Self and a Sense of Tribe

 

 

Maria is beginning her second year of teaching. She has had high expectations for herself and her class. She feels like by the end of the previous year she had developed a workable set of routines and did not feel as overwhelming as she did at the beginning of the year. She has worked hard at classroom management and overall she has fewer problems than many of her colleagues. Maria has been clear about rules and consequences. She gets a lot out of her students as they have responded to her clear expectations. She has tried to stay away from punishments and public shaming. And students feel pretty safe to talk to her. They trust and like her. However, as she examines her class more closely, she feels like it is too much about her. She feels the students are essentially dependent on her direction and behave well (or not) because of what she does. While she likes the level of order and sanity in the class, it is the long term effects of her approach that concern her. It bothers her that the students continuously ask her for confirmation that what they have done or are doing “is OK.”  Moreover, she feels that they act tentatively when making decisions, and excessively rely on her to solve their conflicts and problems, and it worries her when she hears the students make comments such as, “Get back to work or Ms. Valdez is going to get mad at us.” She appreciates that the students are aware of the consequences and are interested in being on task, but she wishes that they would see the value for why it is good to listen, be responsible, treat each other well and work hard aside from being concerned about potential consequences from her. Maria sees other teachers that allow students to make many of the classroom decisions and use a lot of self-directed learning strategies, but she worries about losing control. Some of the teachers that give over significant amounts of power to their students seem to spend a lot of time disappointed in their students for not being responsible. She does not want to spend all day lecturing her students on how to act, or to descend into a 3-Style approach like the teacher next door who gives her students a lot of freedom and all he seems to get is chaos and kids taking advantage of him and the freedom he gives them. She has a sense that she could be more empowering and have a more democratic classroom, but she does not want to sacrifice order.

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-a: Do you empathize with Maria? Why of why not?

 

 

Like Maria many teachers intuitively sense that that there is something more that their classroom management could be accomplishing than merely obtaining obedience and order. They recognize that a teacher-centered 2-Style of management or what Canter (1986) refers to as “assertive discipline” is certainly preferable to taking an authoritarian 4-Style approach (i.e., what Canter label as the “Hostile teacher”).  But they do not see a teacher-centered approach leading to the kinds of growth and motivation that they ultimately want to see from their students. They receive an endless supply of advice for what “works” and for how to avoid ending up with a 3-Style approach (i.e., which Canter terms “passive”). Yet they find that the majority of advice that they are given either sounds to them too teacher-centered and gimmicky, or too ill-defined and unrealistic.

 

The purpose of this chapter is to outline a step-by-step process for creating a student-centered 1-Style classroom and a functioning community i.e., the transformative classroom. This chapter offers practical strategies for developing a more student-centered form of management, as well as for promoting a collective sense of responsibility and community in one’s class.

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-b: Some readers opened up this book having already possessing a commitment to a student-centered approach.  Others may have been persuaded to adopt a 1-style approach after some reading.  For those readers this chapter should provide some practical ideas to further develop their approach.  Other readers may find themselves attracted to aspects of the 1-style approach, yet remain most comfortable with maintaining a 2-style approach. For those readers this chapter should provide some academic interest.  However, there are likely a good number of readers who intend to take a pragmatic approach to the management style they adopt. For those readers this chapter will offer ideas for making the shift from a 2-style to a 1-style management approach, as the opportunity presents itself. 

 

 

1-Style Classroom - Returning to the Natural State

The natural state of learning is one in which students feel intrinsically motivated, a sense of belonging, excited to learn and use their learning to make a difference in the group.

This natural state is a transformative state. However, few students learn in classrooms that promote this condition. In fact, over the course of their education most students become increasingly removed from this state. The 1-Style classroom endeavors to promote a natural state of learning by using management strategies that empower students, and create a needs satisfying environment.  Given that this natural state is often rather foreign to many of our students, attempting to develop a 1-style classroom may require some patience as we will need to help our students adjust to it and awaken aspects of themselves that may have become dormant.

 

The 1-Style Classroom is possible at any grade level. I have seen fully functional, self-directed classrooms full of 1st graders, and High School Seniors, and all grades in between. I have seen 1-Style classrooms in all kinds of schools. But we need to be realistic. Some students will take to this style more readily than others. One the one hand, if we have been assigned a group of students who have developed a deeply-entrenched failure psychology and a habit of externalizing their responsibility, we have a project on our hands. On the other hand, if we have been handed a group of students who is experienced at being self-directed and is eager to take on responsibility, we will be able to shape them into a 1-Style Community in a short period of time. Does one of these groups need our efforts more than the other? Does one of these groups deserve to learn in an empowering environment more than the other?

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-c: Have you heard a teacher tell you that teaching their students to be self-responsible will not work with their students? What are they saying about their students’ future?

 

 

 

What is the 1-Style Classroom?

While a “1-Style Classroom” management approach as defined in this book and a “Classroom Community” are similar, each has its own distinct qualities (see Figure 17.1). First let’s examine the qualities of the 1-Style Classroom.

 

·         Teacher as Facilitator/Leader. The teacher in the 1-Style classroom is not the boss, the police, or the attendant. She/he is a leader. The teacher’s role is to create the conditions for students to achieve best. The 1-Style leader is neither permissive nor domineering. He/she is intentional in their effort to promote a shared vision among the members of the class and effectively facilitate and manage that vision.

·         Self-Responsible. Students in the 1-Style Classroom act responsibly, because they recognize that it is to the benefit of both the class and themselves. In contrast to a teacher-centered class in which responsibility is defined by following directions, in the student-centered class, responsibility is defined by making choices that are good for the group, demonstrate accountability to the agreed upon group goals, and contribute to a higher levels of learning and function.

·         Clear Implicit Expectations. In the 1-Style Classroom, expectations are shared and understood on a deep level. Knowing the expectations is not simply about remembering them, it is about understanding why they are valuable and why when we all buy into them, things are better.

·         Learner-Centered Instruction. As discussed in Chapter 13, curriculum that engages and empowers the learner will help promote the goals of the 1-Style Classroom more readily than more teacher centered methods. Giving students ownership of their learning and ownership over their management of their class work synergistically to produce the most transformative results.

·         Self-Directed. The goal of the 1-style classroom is that students learn to self-govern and demonstrate self-discipline. Students learn that the only true discipline is self-discipline.

·         Intrinsic Forms of Motivation. The 1-Style class is structured to promote intrinsic versus extrinsic forms of motivation. Bribes and gimmicks are not useful in this environment. Just as students experience the needs satisfying effect of doing meaningful work, they recognize that being responsible, thinking about the needs of others, being given power over the decisions that affect them is needs satisfying as well.

·         Group Functions Collectively. As opposed to the students responding to the will of the teacher, the group considers the good of the collective when making choices. The 1-style class works like a team with each member recognizing that he/she can only achieve  their potential working cooperatively with the other members.

·         Intentional Promotion of Success Psychology. In the 1-Style classroom, the teacher maintains an awareness of how his/her actions are contributing the success psychology of the students. The each of three sub-factors, 1) internal locus of control, 2) acceptance and belonging, and 3) mastery orientation provide a lens to guide decision making and assess the classes’ progress toward greater collective health.

·         Social Contract. The foundation of the governance of the 1-Style Classroom is a well-established system of social bonds, expectations, and rules. This “Social Contract” is explained in Chapters 9-11.

 

What is a Classroom Community?

A classroom community will have many of the qualities of the 1-Style Classroom however, it will also have the following distinct features.

 

·         Membership and Shared Identity. In a community, members share a unique identity. This identity creates a sense of belonging and membership. Each community has distinctive qualities that members adopt as their own.

·         Common Purpose and Goals. On some level, a community is working to accomplish something collectively.  It has a purpose and a reason to be that works to the benefit of its members.

·         Communal Bonds in addition to Social Bonds. In Chapter 9, we examined the differences between social and communal bonds. While communities, like any functioning body, require social bonds, what defines them as a community are their communal bonds. Whereas Social bonds address such questions as “What is my responsibility to the group?” and “What can I expect from others?” Communal bonds answer such questions as “What can I do to make the community better?” and “When I have needs who can I count on?” Social bonds deal with issues of rights and responsibilities. Communal bonds deal with issues of relationship, obligation, and the greater good.

·         Traditions, Rituals and History. Over time, a community develops a history and a shared story. To mark this history, a community will observe traditions and collectively remember their past. Rituals and customs act to bond a community by creating a shared “socially constructed reality,” and way of life.

 

As one can see, the 1-Style Classroom and the Classroom Community will have their own unique characteristics (see Figure 17.1). Communities do not always possess efficiency and facilitative leadership, and one can create a 1-Style Classroom without traditions, rituals and a strong collective identity. However, these two types of entities share much in common. And for those teachers who desire either one or the other, it will make a great deal of sense to create both simultaneously as they operate synergistically.  For that reason this chapter will examine how to accomplish a classroom that included the qualities of both.

 

Figure 17.1: Venn Diagram – Intersection of the Qualities of Two Entities 1) Communities and 2) 1-Style Classrooms

Qualities of 1-Style Classrooms

Qualities of both 1-classrooms and Communities

Qualities of Communities

Self-Responsibility

Culture of Listening

Efficiency

Clear Expectations

Success Psychology

Self-Directed

Teacher as Facilitator

Social Contract

 

Communal Bonds

Collective Purpose

Group Accomplishments

Shared Values

Caring Leadership

Sense of Belonging

Traditions, Rituals and History

Shared Identity

Shared “Socially Constructed Reality”

 

 

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-d: As you examine Figure 17.1, which of the qualities do you find the most compelling? What are you essential goals for your students?

 


 

What Will it Take to Create My 1-Style Classroom Community?

To achieve a 1-Style Classroom Community it will require the following basic requirements?

 

·         Intention. To successfully lead a 1-Style Classroom Community we must have a vision of what they want to accomplish. The intention of promoting self-responsible students needs to be ever present in our minds and guide our actions. The requirement of the 1-Style teacher to be purposeful in what they say and do is far greater than any of the other three management styles.

·         Awareness. We need to be ever conscious of both the covert and overt factors (discussed in Chapter 3) within the classroom “socially constructed reality” that will undermine our success. The mental games (especially the social Darwinism), the patterns within us that cause us to get negative, and the students tendency to revert to “failure psychology” thinking, all have the potential to hamstring our efforts, and therefore must be given sufficient attention. Being present and aware generally will also be critical.  Being in tune with the state of mind of the group is necessary.

·         Skills. Both this chapter and previous chapters provide many strategies that will contribute to our success in this effort. It will be necessary that we are familiar with the skills that the students will need to obtain in the process of becoming more self-responsible. As has been discussed many times in the book, it is important that we refrain from certain dysfunctional practices in addition to incorporating more effective practices.

·         Commitment. Creating a 1-Style Classroom Community is difficult. If it was easy a greater number of teachers would be doing it. But as we can see they are not. The 1-Style Classroom requires commitment, patience and perseverance. The students will most likely initially resist our efforts (they have grown accustomed being dependent and dysfunctional) and we will likely experience a strong tendency to want to either take over and adopt more of a 2-Style or give up and adopt more of a 3-Style. We may find it necessary to give ourselves a “pep talk” once in a while and remind ourselves why it is that we are taking the road that we are. Also, our efforts will be more successful and less stressful if we are working collaboratively with others who have similar goals for their classrooms.

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-e: One of the disappointing realizations that many idealistic and ambitious teachers make is that their efforts are not always appreciated by their peers. In some schools this may take the form of a subtle competitive attitude, whereas in some schools there may be open resentment toward those that who are attempting to do something positive and ambitious. The reasons why this occurs are complicated, but it is more common than most of us expect when we enter the profession. Attempting to create a 1-Style Classroom will likely engender resentment from some of your colleagues. It may be helpful to find some colleagues that are supportive or your efforts and to whom you can talk. Most teachers who head down the road of the 1-Style classroom will need some emotional and technical support.

 

 

Assess the Receptiveness of Your Groups of Students

Any group of students can become a functioning 1-Style Classroom. Some groups will just require more time and effort than others. For some groups of students, a 1-Style of management will feel familiar to other contexts in their life (i.e., home, previous classes, afterschool groups, etc). For these students, there will be little remediation required. We will not be fighting against a failure psychology and/or a hard mistrusting emotional shell. We will simply need to develop the skills at each stage of the process. For other groups, a 1-Style approach will seem as unfamiliar as if you were speaking a foreign language. I have taught both kinds of groups. When faced with the more challenging task, even the most ambitious among us will be tempted to give in and revert to a style of teaching to which our students are accustomed, i.e., to use a 4-Style with a group that is used to being treated that way. But there are a couple reasons to maintain our intention to create a 1-Style approach with this group. First, it is possible. There are not many who try it, but I have seen many 1-Style classrooms in schools where 95% of the other teachers in the school assumed that the only thing that would work with the students was a 2 or 4-Style approach. It may take longer to accomplish. We may only succeed at creating a foundation. But if we do, we have had a transformative effect far beyond anything that we observe. We will only see the tip of the Iceberg of the changes that we have made. Second, the students are worth it. We have the choice to perpetuate the dysfunction or transform it. Do we want to be one more link in the chain of failure, or do we want to be a catalyst for change? 

 

Developmental Sequence

Creating a 1-Style Classroom Community can only be accomplished in a developmental sequence. We will need to lead our students through the following three stages of development – 1) Formation, 2) Transition, and 3) Encouragement. Each stage requires the foundation of the preceding stages to function successfully.  We will need to develop a foundation of trust and clarity, before we can be successful promoting self-directed behavior. Likewise, our students will need to feel as sense of belonging and identity before the class will begin to look anything like a community. In the remainder of this chapter, we will examine the development of 1-Style Classroom Community in relation to each of the three developmental stages.

 

Stage 1- Formation

Management Goals – Clarity and Intention

The foundation of the 1-Style Classroom is built upon the clarity of the expectations. A well-established cause and effect relationship needs to be promoted in the minds of each student – when we do A, B will follow. Therefore, as the facilitator of the process, we need to be intentional about taking action and raising awareness that promote clarity of expectations. High expectations are nice. But students cannot rise to a level of behavior that they do not know (on a real and material level). Having high expectations is just a start. We must teach our expectations and the skills required to function self-responsibly. Therefore, we will need to be deliberate about creating the following features within the class.

·         Social Contract and Social Bonds. Students need to understand that 1) they are safe, and 2) that they need to be responsible to the others in the class. In chapters 9-11, we outlined the process of creating a social contract and defined by well established social bonds. A social contract exists to the degree that it is understood and shared. Therefore, we will know that it is working when we see students take ownership of the agreed upon principles of the contract. The collective sense of safety and faith in the contract will come mainly from the fact that we consistently take action and implement consequences, both positive and negative.

 

·         Culture of Listening and Respect. To function effectively, the students in the class need to have an expectation that they must be attentive and can expect that others will be attentive to them – in other words being part of a “culture of listening.” A culture of listening and respect will be a prerequisite for many of the more advanced stages in the development of the 1-Style Classroom. Chapter 12 outlines a detailed process for creating this environment.

 

·         Social Frames. From the first day of class, students should recognize that there are deliberate and conspicuous social frames operating in the 1-Style Class. As discussed in Chapter 3, students should become increasingly conscious of the relationships between freedom and responsibility, success and recognition, and warmth and respect.

 

·         Operationalize Conceptual Expectations. Concepts like responsible, respectful, cooperative, positive attitude, full-effort, risk taking, being creative are all abstractions. They will remain abstractions until they are “operationalized” and made real within the students’ experience. The burden is on us to make these ideas concrete and personally meaningful to students. Typically, we make the assumption that either student already know what it means to exhibit these behaviors, or that they will grasp the concept as a result of a handful of verbal comments that we make. In most cases, we greatly over estimate the degree to which students have an operational working knowledge of the concepts that we use to describe good behavior. I challenge you to survey they yourself, I bet you will be surprised. There are many strategies for making conceptual expectations concrete. First, we can use positive recognitions of behavior. When we see behavior that defines high quality effort, for example, we can publically recognize the practice action that we observed that characterized the term. Second, as discussed in Chapter 14, we can ask students to publically recognize one another’s positive behavior. Third, we can use an assessment system such as that outlined in Chapter 22. This can be done formally or informally. If we have been given a class that seems to lack both a conceptual as well as a behavioral knowledge of how to act in a responsible and functional manner, these kinds of systems can be the most effective means for promoting this understanding and changing behavior. The community development section that follows will offer additional ideas in this area.

 

·         Putting in Place Mechanisms for Effectively Facilitating Cooperative Learning, Conflict Resolution and Class Meetings. As early as possible, students should begin to practice cooperative learning and conflict resolution. Strategies for doing so are outlined in detail in Chapters 14 and 15. In this first stage, our primary focus should be on teaching these skills rather than being too concerned with how effective each appears. Therefore, avoid short cuts. For example, we need to maintain our expectation that cooperative groups follow the protocols that we have set out even if our students tell us that they do not want or need them. Once things have devolved, it is difficult to reestablish the original expectations.

 

Class Meetings should be introduced when the group is ready for them. When this is will need to be left to your judgment. A sound freedom-respect frame and a culture of listening and respect need to be in place before it is wise to attempt a class meeting of any substance. If the idea of a class meeting is new to our students, we might initiate the idea of democratic participation, by holding votes on various classroom matters. Also, we might start with shorter less consequential topics for class meetings, such as whether we like the shades open or closed.  In addition, the Social Contract development and evolution process can act to introduce the class meeting protocol. In these early stages, we need to keep class meetings short and efficient. Students need to recognize they have an opportunity to be heard, but excessive complaining, bird walking, spurious comments, or personal attacks are inappropriate. A more complete process for facilitating class meetings is explained later in the chapter.

 

·         Establish Your Role and Vision. Unless students have come from a class in which a 1-Style of management was used, they will likely assign to you a role similar to those adopted by the teachers that they have had in the past. It may be useful to tell them right up front that “In this class, I am not going to get mad at you, lecture you, shame you, wish you were different, play games with you, compare you to other students, nor will I accept excuses, poor efforts, disrespect of others, or selfishness. And soon you will not accept those things from yourself or the other students in the class.” Expect students to question your resolve early in the year. In so many words, they will ask you (and test you), “Do you really mean what you say?” “A few put downs are OK, right?” “Making a mediocre effort is OK once in a while, right?” At some point they will learn, mostly from our actions, that we are absolute about some things. Next, it will be useful to give them a sense of your vision. Where is this going? No matter the current state of affairs or the self-image with which students enter the class, students need to be sold the idea that soon, they will be respectful, responsible, self-directed learners. And that you have no doubt that they are capable of and will ultimately accomplish that goal. The vision will eventually emerge from the collective, but at this stage it needs to come from us so that we need can to set it out on in the right direction.

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-f: It is tempting to resent our students early in the year for trying to test us, assuming that we are okay with their self-destructive behavior, or implying that we really do not mean what we say. But we need to give them a break and realize that they are just responding to what they are used to. As things get better, they will forget the way that they were.  When that day comes, are we still going to be holding it against them?

 

 

·         Development of Clear Expectations

As was discussed in chapter 6, expectations are rooted in the law of cause and effect. Students know if . . ., then . . . For example, if they listen they will know what is going on, and things happen smoothly, and if they do not, they will not know what is going on.  In addition, there may be other consequences that the teacher implements as well. However, if we explain things repeatedly, complain that there is too much talking, and are inconsistent with our consequences or uses illogical punishments, no cause and effect relationship will develop in the minds of the students, except that “when the teacher gets mad, he/she complains, but does nothing of consequence.”

 

If we model and expect a type of behavior – for example respectful interactions, the students will soon see that there is an expectation for such behavior. But we must make the students aware that there is a value to using the behavior and a consequence when it does not happen. Lectures, guilt, preaching, chronicling failure seem like action, but they are operationally useless. We must take action.  Model the behavior deliberately. And over time help the student recognize the value that behavior has to both themselves and the class. No matter how repetitive it may feel, it is useful to promote mantra-type language. For example, “in this class we all try our best.” Or “this class has only responsible learners.” Or “the great thing about this class is that we always listen to each other and expect to be listened to.”

 

The difference between 2-style and 1-style approach expectations relates to what the students are responding to. In the 2-Style classroom the student is responding to clear and consistent consequences and modeling. The student knows what is going to happen and the teacher follows through. The cause and effect is created in a systematic manner and reinforced each day.  In the 1-Style classroom the clarity is just as evident, but the cause and effect is located (psychologically) in the students’ awareness of the purpose of the behavior. For example, if we all listen to each other, we develop respect and learn more. And it feels right on some intrinsic level. In most cases, both 1 and 2-Style approach will need to begin with much the same set of strategies, but eventually the teacher attempting a 1-Style approach will want to encourage a shift in students’ thinking from the extrinsic consequences of an action to the intrinsic value of an action.

 

 

Community Development Goals – Safety and Belonging

When we look out at that group on the first day, we may not see it, but the pervasive emotion in the room will likely be one of insecurity. Students may not show it, but on some level most of them feel some apprehension and alienation from the other members of the class. Simply put, the other members are still very much “other.” This insecurity will work against the development of community within the group. First and foremost, community must be built within an emotional climate of safety and belonging.

 

As the teacher we are the only one in the equation that can help the students past their insecurity and on the road to feeling bonded as a group. It will be useful to keep in mind that each and every member of the class wants the same thing deep down – the natural condition. In our core we all want to feel safe, loved, valued, and connected. However, when we don’t get these basic needs met, we compensate. Each students default compensation strategies will look a bit different (e.g., acting like they are too cool, a know-it-all, apathetic, overly accommodating, clowning, etc.) . But we need to maintain our awareness of the fact that our students are not their compensation strategies. Moreover, we need to avoid the trap of assuming that the existing dysfunctional group dynamics (i.e., social Darwinism, casual abuse, drama, obsession with “their thing,” etc) are natural. They may be normal, but they are not natural. 

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-g: Some readers may be wondering what I mean by making a distinction between natural and normal. Natural is what is possible and feels the most true to our nature. Normal is what happens by accident. If we do nothing toward achieving the natural, we will get normal. Normal is characterized to a great extent by dysfunction. Natural is what we fundamentally need. We can test this assumption later when we have helped the group develop into a community. After we have helped them move from normal to natural, we can ask them if they would rather go back to the way that they were, or ask them if they prefer the climate in this class versus the ones where they need to raise their defense to survive the threatening and chaotic environment.

 

 

In Stage One of our process of community development we will therefore, need to make an intentional effort to 1) create emotional safety, 2) promote the individual membership and identity of each student, 3) cultivate social bonds and a sense of fairness, and 4) make a connection with each student.

 

Emotional Safety, and Intolerance of Put downs and Destructive Language.

Research has shown that verbal abuse and bullying has increased in the past decade (DeVoe, 2003). In nearly every school, including those considered the safest and more affluent, our research has shown that students accept verbal abuse as normal part of their experience during the school day (Shindler, Jones, Taylor, Cadenas, 2003). While it may be common it is extremely harmful.  We have all experienced the deadening effect it has over time to the quality of life in a school.

 

This is one of those areas where students need us to be absolute. We in our role of classroom leader need to be absolutely intolerant of put downs, verbal abuse, name calling, and bullying. If we are not, students will not feel safe. Students need to see real enthusiasm for those things that you regard as absolute. When there are acts of abuse, we need give consequences (see chapter 10), and send the message that “there will never be a time, when put downs are okay.”

 

It may be helpful to create an expectation in the class that “we only say things that make us better.” We can call this anything that we like (e.g., life giving language, positive language, constructive language, affirming language, etc). But it will be a good place to use a mantra – e.g., “In this class we only use affirming language.” Students will come to know that no matter what they hear when they are outside the walls of our class, within our walls, they are safe from abuse.

 

 

Chapter Reflection 17-h: Reflect on the common experience of a new HS English teacher. Their goal was to create a student-centered class, as part of this she wanted her students to share their writing with one another and become a community of authors. After two months, she was a little disappointed. While her students were learning to share with her and access their inner creativity, did not feel comfortable sharing their work with one another. What would you tell this teacher? What stage of the community development process would you put this teacher’s class? 

 

 

Individual Value, Membership and Identity

Many students spend their time in school feeling misunderstood, alienated, and as though they have no value. Many times groups of friends, sports, clubs, and even gangs can fill the void that results from these unmet needs. Yet, before our students can be expected to come out of their self-protective shell and consider the needs of others, they need to feel like they are valued and “someone” in the group.

 

In this early developmental period in the classes’ life, we need to send the message that every student is important and valued. Every student needs to feel like they have a contribution to make. Some of the strategies that will support this goal will include 1) giving students roles and responsibilities, 2) finding out who the students are, and 3) beginning cooperative activities as soon as possible.

 

·         Giving Students Roles and Responsibility. As soon as possible, incorporate students into leadership roles. If an activity can be managed by a student, take yourself out of the role of leader, and hand it over to them as soon as they show that they are capable. But recall the freedom – responsibility frame when doing so. Leadership roles are for those that have demonstrated the maturity and the commitment required. So developing the expectations for how to be a leader will require the same process as the development of other expectations. The following pedagogical sequence may be helpful to follow - teach, recognize positive examples, practice in a low threat situation, practice in a more intense situation, then recognize the value of demonstrating a high quality of the expectation (in this case the skill of being a good leader). Some teachers assign roles to all students. This can elevate the sense that roles are for favorites. If you cannot find roles for all students, make sure that they know that all students will be rotated into a role eventually.

 

If you are having difficulty coming up with roles that students can take within your class it may be useful to simply ask yourself the question, “Would a student be capable of leading or managing ___ activity?” Good examples of situations that students are fully capable of leading are classroom routines, calendar activities, dismissals and recording simple data (i.e., milk counts, who has completed an activity, etc.).  However, do not put students in situations that require them to make interpretations of value that effect other students’ grades, social standing or dignity.

 

·         Allow Students to Share their Story. All of us have a story, and no matter how shy we are, we want others to know us. We want to be more than just a name and a physical appearance. We each have interests and experiences and dreams. We are all unique.

 

There are many effective strategies for helping students share more of who they are with the other members of the class. In primary grades it can be a powerful experience for students to write a poem about themselves (See example at the end of the chapter). For students who are older, we can select a number of ways that they can put their mark on the room. We can have them create a personal collage. We can have them write a paragraph about themselves as a caption to a drawing or photo of themselves. If we want the information from each student to be more uniform, we can give them all the same prompts, for Example

o        My name is:

o        My family includes:

o        3 Things I like:

o        3 Things I don’t like:

o        Most people do not know this about me:

o        My Favorite Movies are:

o        My Favorite Foods are:

o