CSULA Department of English | Composition Resources

Catalog Description | Learning Objectives
| Requirements | Recommended Textbooks
| ENGL 095/096 Portfolios
ENGL 096 Scoring Guide

Catalog Description (back
to top
)

Prerequisite: English
Placement Test  (placement determined by student’s score) or passing
grade in ENGL 095.  Frequent essays based on reading and responding to
expository prose;  instruction in expository writing conventions and
critical reading strategies.  Graded CR/NC.  Not open to students with
credit for this course, an equivalent, or a higher level English composition
course.  Students with two NC grades may not enroll again.  No credit
toward baccalaureate.

Learning Objectives (back
to top
)

  • Write
    with greater focus by generating a thesis that states a controlling purpose

  • Develop
    ideas more fully and fluently

  • Read
    and respond critically to outside texts

  • Analyze
    personal experiences with specific reference to an outside text

  • Incorporate
    quotations and paraphrase into essays with correct attribution

  • Use
    the writing process effectively to develop ideas and substantively revise
    their essays

  • Edit
    final drafts to eliminate systematic errors in English sentence structure,
    mechanics, and usage

Requirements (back to
top
)

Students are expected to

  • Write 5-7 first draft
    essays approximately 2-3 pages in length

  • Develop critical reading
    strategies for expository texts. Use ideas from the text to analyze or
    reflect on their experience or observations, either by quoting or
    paraphrasing, in their assigned essays

  • Substantially revise two
    of these essays for inclusion in the final portfolio

  • Write an in-class essay at
    the end of the quarter for inclusion in the portfolio

  • Attend a minimum of 80% of
    the scheduled class sessions

  • Actively participate in
    prewriting and revision activities during class

Recommended Textbooks (back
to top
)

Handbook

If you assign or
recommend a handbook, please consider using the following so that students
do not have to buy different handbooks over the course of several quarters in the
composition program.

The Everyday Writer (4th ed.), edited by Andrea Lunsford (Bedford/St.
Martin’s): A handbook with a strong rhetorical focus; the 4th edition includes
2009 MLA and 2010 APA updates along with other documentation formats.

Texts (* recommended for new faculty)

Readers:

* Cohen, 50 Essays 2nd ed. (Bedford/St. Martin’s)

Just
the essays, with minimal apparatus (activities, discussion questions, or writing
topics); many good “standard” texts for English 096.

 

Atwan, America Now 7th ed. (Bedford/St. Martin’s)

Well-focused,
thoughtful, and very up-to-the-minute, this text has many short, provocative
readings taken from recent periodicals, arranged into interesting themes.

Borrowman and White, The
Promise of America
(Pearson Longman)

Brand
new and perhaps both a bit long and a bit challenging for English 096, this book
nonetheless has many thoughtful essays that could make for an interesting and
productive course.  The theme of the
text is similar to Rereading America
(recommended for English 101). 

Rosa and Eschholz, Models
for Writers
9th ed. (Bedford/St. Martin’s)

The
organization of this text is not one that the committee found useful (it was
more mechanistic that we prefer), but it contains many good readings appropriate
for English 096.

ENGL 095/096 Portfolios (back
to top
)

Grading and Portfolio Evaluation

English 095 and 096 are graded Credit or No Credit (CR/NC).
Students are evaluated on a portfolio consisting of three writing samples: two
essays written during the quarter (revised and edited, with the rough drafts and
the original writing prompt attached beneath the final presentation draft), plus
a final in-class essay which is administered during the tenth week of classes,
usually at the final class meeting. Generally, instructors develop their own
prompt for the in-class essay, drawing on topics or themes that they have
considered during the quarter.

English 095 and 096 instructors attend a mid-term
socialization, usually held on Friday of the fifth week of classes, to read
sample portfolios from previous quarters and to develop an understanding of the
holistic scoring rubric and portfolio evaluation standards. During the fall
quarter, instructors grade portfolios on Friday (English 095) and Saturday
(English 096) of the tenth week of classes during an all-day holistic grading
session held on campus. During winter and spring quarters, portfolios for both
095 and 096 are read on Friday of the tenth week. Portfolio grades are based
upon the entirety of the portfolio and graded holistically, according to rubrics
established for each course. (See the Appendices.) End-of-quarter procedures and
directions for the portfolios are distributed by the eighth week of the quarter.

Responding to Papers

Instructors are expected to give adequate and specific
feedback on student essays through conferences and/or comments on papers. Some
instructors do not grade individual essays, but rather guide students in
choosing essays and revising them to create a successful portfolio, making it
clear that requests for further revision indicate that the essay is not yet
ready for the portfolio. By the middle of the quarter, instructors should begin
giving students more specific information about the quality of their writing, so
students who are not doing passing work are aware of their status. Some
instructors use the CR/NC distinction since that is the ultimate decision.
Others give a numerical grade based upon the portfolio scoring guide for that
course. Whatever their method, most instructors strive to strike a balance
between encouraging students and giving them an honest assessment of their work.
Students are understandably upset when they believe they have been doing passing
work, but then receive a NC grade on their portfolio.

Peer response groups are also recommended as a way of
helping students develop their ability to critique essays, of increasing the
feedback that students receive, and providing an audience other than the
instructor. Many students will benefit from additional tutorial instruction
available in the University Writing Center.

ENGL 096 Scoring Guide (back
to top
)

Acrobat iconClick
here for a printer-friendly version of the ENGL 096 Scoring Guide

English 096 Scoring Guide

6 Very Strong

The 6 portfolio demonstrates very good writing ability. Revised essays
in a 6 portfolio typically

  • exhibit a clear purpose and a strong sense of audience.
  • address the topic clearly and thoughtfully, responding effectively to all
    aspects of the assignment.
  • are very clearly focused and coherently organized, with theses or main
    ideas supported by insightful reasons and well-chosen examples.
  • meaningfully engage the text or texts through apt and specific references.
  • show improvement over successive drafts, when necessary.
  • use diction, phrasing, and syntax very effectively.
  • are largely free from errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics.

The final in-class essay may exhibit less control of language than the
revised essays, but will be thoughtful, well-organized, and adequately
developed. The student is clearly ready for English 101.


5 Strong

A 5 portfolio demonstrates strong writing ability. Revised essays in a
5 portfolio typically

  • exhibit a sense of purpose and audience
  • address the topic clearly, but may respond to some aspects of the
    assignment more effectively than others.
  • are clearly focused and organized, with theses or main ideas supported by
    appropriate reasons and examples.
  • appropriately engage the text or texts.
  • show improvement over successive drafts, when necessary.
  • use diction, phrasing, and syntax correctly and effectively.
  • may have a few errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics, but nothing that
    confuses or distracts the reader.

The final in-class essay may exhibit less control of language than the
revised essays, but overall will be focused, organized, and adequately
developed. The student is ready for English 101.


4 Adequate

A 4 portfolio demonstrates adequate writing ability. Revised essays in
a 4 portfolio typically

  • exhibit a sense of purpose and audience
  • address the topic adequately, but may respond to some aspects of the
    assignment less effectively than others.
  • are reasonably well-focused and organized, with theses or main ideas
    supported by reasons and examples.
  • responds to text or texts in routine and mechanical ways.
  • show improvement over successive drafts.
  • demonstrate basic competence in diction, phrasing, and sentence structure,
    although there may be some imprecision and/or repetitiveness.
  • may have some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics, but these will be
    neither serious enough to confuse nor frequent enough to distract the reader.

The final in-class essay may exhibit less control of language, have
occasional lapses of focus, some uneven development, or a mechanical
organization, but it will respond to the topic at least minimally or implicitly.
The student will benefit from the challenge of English 101.

3 Inadequate

A 3 portfolio demonstrates developing competence, but is flawed in
some significant way(s). Revised essays in a 3 portfolio may

  • not exhibit a sense of purpose and audience
  • not address the topic adequately or might neglect aspects of the task.
  • be lacking in focus or unclearly organized; may consist mostly of
    generalizations without support or details without conclusions.
  • minimally respond to the text or texts; may use the text or texts in a
    largely irrelevant way; or not respond to texts at all.
  • not show meaningful improvement over successive drafts, suggesting the
    writer does not yet understand how to revise effectively.
  • lack control of diction, phrasing, and sentence structure.
  • have errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that are serious enough to
    confuse or frequent enough to distract the reader.

The final in-class essay often exhibits very limited control of language, and
may be marked by lapses of focus, uneven development, and poor organization. The
student would benefit from repeating English 096.


2 Very Weak

A 2 portfolio is seriously flawed, and generally is marked by more
than one
of the following characteristics. Revised essays in a 2 portfolio
may

  • not exhibit any sense of purpose or audience
  • significantly misunderstand the topic or neglect important aspects of the
    task.
  • be incoherently organized or lacking in focus, with inadequate development
    of ideas.
  • inappropriately respond to text or texts, or may not use the text at all.
  • not show meaningful improvement over successive drafts, suggesting the
    writer's inability to respond to instruction.
  • be confusing in diction, phrasing, and sentence structure.
  • have frequent and serious errors that interfere with meaning.

The final in-class essay often exhibits very limited control of language, and
may be marked by lapses of focus, uneven development, and poor organization.


1 Incomplete

A 1 portfolio is incomplete in significant ways (for instance,
does not have drafts of essays or other required materials or is missing one or
more essays).