1. What is Program
Outcomes Assessment? 
2. Why are we doing Program Outcomes Assessment? 
3. How is the process described? 
4. How does Program Outcomes Assessment improve student learning and
program success? 
5. How does Program Outcomes Assessment differ from grading exams and
lab/project reports? 
6. Is Students Outcomes Assessment required, or is it optional? 
7. How will Program Outcomes assessment help me do my job better? 
8. What can I do to facilitate the process? 
9. Who are our constituencies and how will they be involved in this
process? Why are they important? 
10. How do we know when our objectives are met? 
11. How will the process impact me as an instructor? 
12. How will we know if the process is working as intended? 
13. How are our objectives consistent with the University's and School's
mission? 
14. How and where do you get information/reading material about ABET 2000
criteria? 
15. Why has our school decided to use the new ABET criteria? 
16. What are the meanings of the frequently used terms:
Vision Statement?
Mission
Statement?
Educational Objectives?
Program
Outcomes?
Program
Assessment? 
17. Who are how are we going to implement
assessment? 
18. How can we get help in developing and implementing the assessment
process? 
19. Where do the funds to conduct assessment come from? 
20. Who decides which student outcomes are measured and are important? 
21. Who decides how the outcomes are measured and what is a passing
score? 
22. Do all schools and universities measure and expect the same outcomes?

23. Does failing to meet an expected outcome prevent accreditation? 
24. Why don't we just use the accumulative GPA of students as the
indicator for outcome? 
25. What is ABET? 
26. What is TQM? 
27. What is WASC?
1. What is Program Outcomes
Assessment?
Program Outcomes Assessment is a curriculum development process that
is intended as a means to improve program success and student learning based on real
evidence. It is a continuous process that involves planning, assessing and feedback.
2. Why are we doing Program Outcomes Assessment?
We have a mandate to implement the Program Outcomes Assessment
process from three areas; University Faculty Handbook, which indicates that assessment is
a significant portion of the academic program review, WASC accreditation guidelines, and
the new ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 mandate. 
3. How is the process
described?
Plan it
Do it
Check it
Revise it
Repeat it
4. How does
Program Outcomes Assessment improve student learning and program success?
It improves the teaching/learning process by a
continuous assessment process similar to TQM.
It helps
you get a better fix on what students are learning through real data.
It heps
you make decisions based on documented feedback from students and employers that go beyond
the usual assessment based on classroom exams, laboratory reports, student evaluation of
teaching, and alumni feedback.

5. How does Program Outcomes
Assessment differ from grading exams and lab/project reports?
Program
Outcomes Assessment provides you with data that helps you point to areas where students
are having difficulty, while exam scores and report grades generally give gross measures
of what students have learned
Program
Outcomes Assessment helps you demonstrate that students are learning what you assume they
have learned, not just the grades they have earned.
Grades
usually provide feedback to individual students, while Program Outcomes assessment
provides feedback about a group of students to faculty members and other constituent
groups.
Ordinary
exams and laboratory reports may be used as part of a Program Outcomes assessment process,
but more attention would have to be paid to some form of item analysis so that statistical
evidence on what students are learning can be obtained.

6. Is Students Outcomes
Assessment required, or is it optional?
Students Outcomes Assessment is required by:
ABET
WASC
University Faculty Handbook for
Program Review
7. How will Program Outcomes
assessment help me do my job better?
Input from constituencies will verify that we are focusing on the
right areas in our curricula. Responses to our assessment review will help us identify
strengths and weaknesses of our programs.

8. What can I do to facilitate the
process?
Read, ask questions and help your department assessment coordinator
implement the assessment process. Become actively involved in the process. 
9. Who are our constituencies and
how will they be involved in this process? Why are they important?
The constituencies are the group of people with common expectations
of our educational programs; the students and their parents, industry employers of our
graduates, faculty, staff and alumni.

10. How do we know when our
objectives are met?
Objectives and outcomes will be met when we receive positive
feedback from all our constituencies.
11. How will the process impact me
as an instructor?
The process will impact you, through positive feedback that will
verify that our curricula are meeting the needs of our students and through negative
feedback that will help us identify where changes need to be made to make our programs,
and by definition curricula, better meet the needs of our constituencies.

12. How will we know if the
process is working as intended?
An indication that the process is working is if our
assessment scores are improving each time we go through the assessment process.
An indication that the process is not working would be if
our assessment grade declines or does not increase.
13. How are our objectives
consistent with the University's and School's mission?
See Program report from your department representative. 
14. How and where do you get
information/reading material about ABET 2000 criteria?
See your department assessment coordinator.

15. Why has our school decided to
use the new ABET criteria?
To receive ABET accreditation, each engineering program must have an
assessment process with documented results that demonstrate: 1) that the outcomes
important to the institutions mission and the program objectives are being measured,
and that the program is achieving desired outcomes and 2) that the results are being used
to improve the program. Beyond ABET accreditation, the assessment process offers each
program a means of close scrutiny aimed at self improvement. 
(from "How do you measure success" p. 9)
16. What are the meanings of the
frequently used terms:
Vision Statement?
A vision statement is a statement that describes where the school,
department or other entity wants to be or how it wants to be viewed.
Mission Statement?
A mission statement describes what a school, department or other
entity does (i.e. what business is it in).
Educational Objectives?
Educational objectives are broad statements of what knowledge our
graduates will have, what skills they will possess, and what attitudes they will hold.
These statements are at the program level.
Program Outcomes?
Program outcomes are measurable indicators that educational
objectives have been met. They are generally more specific than educational objectives and
are at the program level.
Performance Indicators?
Performance indicators are detailed metrics (measures) that indicate
whether a specific outcome has been achieved.
Performance Criteria?
Performance criteria are the performance levels required to satisfy
a particular performance indicator.
Program Assessment?
Program assessment is a process that enables a program to evaluate
how it is performing, with the objective of making improvements to the program so that:
- graduates are adequately prepared to enter into and continue in their
profession.
- improvements in education are stimulated.
- new and innovative approaches to education are encouraged.

(from "How do you measure success" p. 13) 
17. Who are how are we going to
implement assessment?
All faculty will be involved in implementing assessment, but it is
the department assessment coordinator who will bear the brunt of the assessment
implementation. A number of metrics will be used to implement assessment, by measuring
student outcomes, through student and industry surveys, portfolios, capstone courses, and
exit interviews.
18. How can we get help in
developing and implementing the assessment process?
Work with your department assessment representatives, who will have
advice on what other schools and institutions are doing, useful journals and books that
may be worth consulting or will pass your concerns on to the weekly school wide assessment
forum. You may also wish to contact the educational school to seek the help of faculty
members for specialized help. 
(from "How do you measure success" p. 9)
19. Where do the funds to conduct
assessment come from?
Department assessment coordinators receive 12 units of release time
spread over three quarters. The cost of the release time is being supported partially with
School resources and partially with University resources set aside to support faculty in
doing assessment work. 
20. Who decides which student
outcomes are measured and are important?
All student outcomes are measured.

21. Who decides how the outcomes
are measured and what is a passing score?
The passing score, or the performance criteria, is set at a level
that is attainable for all outcomes (ha ha). The School assessment committee has attempted
to quantify outcomes using a five point scale. 
22. Do all schools and
universities measure and expect the same outcomes?
All engineering schools that are being accredited by ABET have to
ensure that core outcomes (the a-k criteria) are measured, but most schools, including
CSULA, have other outcomes that are considered important for their own unique programs.
The technology department is not constrained by ABET, but many of the outcomes of their
programs have the same generic outcomes listed by ABET in their a-k criteria. All schools
probably wish to have the same perfect outcomes. However this will probably never happen. 
23. Does failing to meet an
expected outcome prevent accreditation?
No. During this first attempt at assessment, ABET is more concerned
with process that results. However in future assessment cycles, improvements in outcome
results would be expected as a result of programs implementing changes identified as
necessary by a previous assessment cycle. 
24. Why don't we just use the
accumulative GPA of students as the indicator for outcome?
The emphasis of student outcomes assessment is on what the student
knows, is able to do and has attitudes about, at graduation and two to three years into
his or her profession. To identify this, a new set of performance indicators is needed to
measure outcomes that the cumulative GPA of a student doesnt capture.

25. What is ABET?
ABET, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology Inc.,
is a federation of 28 engineering technical and professional societies, and is recognized
as the sole agency responsible for the accreditation of US educational programs that lead
to engineering degrees. 
26. What is TQM?
Total Quality Management. First identified by Deming, TQM is a
management approach to long term success through customer satisfaction. TQM is based on
the participation of all members of an organization in improving processes, products
services and the culture they work in. 
27. What is WASC?
WASC, the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, is the
accrediting body for programs offered at California State University Los Angeles.
|