|
|
|
 |
| |Americas|
|Harvest of Bones| |Talgua
Archaeological Project| |Talgua Archaeological
Project: A Technical Assessment| |
| |
|
Talgua Archaeological Project:
A Technical Assessment
|
James E. Brady, Christopher
Begley, John Fogarty, Donald J. Stierman, Barbara Luke and Ann Scott
|
| |
|
|
| |
| The Talgua Archaeological
Project was formed as a regional archaeological survey focusing on
the Pre-Columbian remains found near the town of Catacamas in northeastern
Honduras [Figure 1] after the discovery in 1994 of an important ossuary
in the Cueva del Río Talgua [Cave of the Glowing Skulls] (Brady 1997,
Brady et al. 1995a, 1995b). The project, directed by James Brady of
California State University, Los Angeles brought together specialists
from a number of institutions to investigate this little known area. |
| |
| Cave Ossuaries |
|
The Cueva del Río Talgua was heavily vandalized after the preliminary
survey in September 1994 and continued to be vandalized up to
the end of the project in 1996. For that reason, it was not an important
focus of study after 1994 and the subsequent work carried out there
has been more in the nature of salvage. During the 1995 season,
two new deposits of bone were discovered by John Fogarty, in niches
high above the floor of the main burial chamber. Although the bone
was extremely fragile, all the pieces were intact and painted a
deep red. These deposits provide archaeologists with a model of
how the rest of the bone was probaby preserved before the vandalization.
A number of calcite covered bone deposits
were also vandalized. In one lot (III-4), a skull was chipped out
of its matrix and stolen. In their haste, the thieves failed to
notice the rim of a ceramic vessel placed below the skull and surrounded
by a bundle of long bones, presumably belonging to the same individual.
The vessel, although broken, was removed from the calcite. The find
bears on an argument made after the first season of work in which
we speculated that the question of whether the grave goods were
associated with specific individuals or were generalized offerings
could be definitively answered by access to the bones encased in
calcite. If offerings were present, they would be cemented in their
original positions so the associations could be determined. The
discoveries in lot III-4 clearly indicates that offerings were associated
with particular individuals. The point is an important one, especially
in the case of the marble vessels, because individualized offerings
would suggest that differences in wealth existed and, therefore,
a degree of social stratification had already been achieved.
A number of pieces of charcoal were
found inside the vessel and submitted for radiocarbon dating. Because
of the small quantity, Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) had to
be employed and gave a reading of 2510 +/- 60 years B.P. [Beta-85276;
calibrated one sigma results: 515-790 B.C.] which has three intercept
points on the calibration curve falling between 600-765 B.C. The
date overlaps earlier measurements [Beta-77105, calibrated one sigma
results: 905-1030 B.C.; Beta-77106, calibrated one sigma results:
780-825 B.C.] and reinforces our confidence that the ossuary is
early. The reading is also important because it dates the vessel.
The modeled face on the pot is similar to many of the other vessels
recovered in 1994 and suggests, therefore, other similar ceramic
is early as well.
Two additional AMS dates were run
by Dr. David McJunkin of the University of Wisconsin - Madison Radiocarbon
Laboratory on protein removed from human bone. A sample from one
of the lots on the second of the three levels of the ossuary gave
a reading of approximately 1400 B.C. [WG285; 3110 +/- 85 years B.P.],
the earliest date from the cave. If accurate, the date would indicate
that the ossuary was used very early in the Early Formative Period
and suggests that cave ossuary burial was a much more ancient form
than suspected. The date may also indicate that the earliest material
is on the lower levels of theTalgua ossuary so that additional samples
need be run from the first level to determine when people actually
began bringing their dead to the cave. The second sample produced
a far more recent date [WG286; 1385 +/- 75 years B.P.] which may
indicate that Classic Period populations buried additional individuals
in the cave around 650 A.D. In both individuals the stable isotope
readings indicate that little corn was being eaten.
The most notable find of the 1996
field season was the investigation of a new ossuary cave discovered
by Nelson Alvarado, an employee of the Instituto Hondureño de Antropología
e Historia (IHAH) hired to guard the Cueva del Río Talgua. The Cueva
de las Arañas was
mapped and explored by Fogarty working for IHAH as a visiting specialist
sponsored by the U.S. Information Agency. Located only a few hundred
yards from the entrance to the Cueva del Río Talgua, the Cueva de
las Arañas is a small cave, only about 85 m deep [Figure 2]. A surface
sweep of the cave's entrance chamber conducted by Ann Scott recovered
a range of artifacts believed to be associated with rituals. The
ceramics from the entrance appear to date to the Late Classic Period
(600-900 A.D.). Large quantities of riverine snail shells (Pachychilus
sp.), many with the spire broken off, were recovered along the highly
compacted use-floor in the chamber. This type of snail shell is
frequently encountered in Maya caves where they may have been part
of a ritual meal (Brady 1989:380-381). Their discovery in the Talgua
area suggests that the use of the snails in ritual was far more
widely distributed than previously recognized. A small burned corn
cob was also recovered which is of interest because stable isotopes
have shown that the Middle Formative (1000-300 B.C.) population
was not eating large quantities of maize. Scott speculates that
the cob is probably contemporaneous with the ceramics and may represent
evidence for a shift in subsistence. The exact date for the introduction
of maize into this area and its importance in the local diet, however,
are still open questions. Offerings of small maize cobs as part
of cave rituals has been documented at Copan (Brady 1995:34), in
Alta Verapaz, Guatemala (Sharer and Sedat 1987:248), Naj Tunich
(Brady 1989:86) and Cueva de las Pinturas (Brady et al. 1997) in
the Peten and Bats'ub/25 Flight Cave, Belize (Prufer and Dunham
n.d.).
The Cueva de las Arañas contains a number
of deposits of human burials. The main deposit is located at the
very rear of the cave in a small circular chamber which at one time
contained active formations. For this reason, all of the bones are
preserved within a protective cap of calcite. Unlike the bright
white calcite covering the remains in the Cueva del Río Talgua,
the calcite in the Cueva de las Arañas is badly yellowed suggesting
that water no longer enters the chamber as it did when the bones
were deposited. The evidence suggests that, like Talgua, these were
secondary burials but, unlike the Talgua burials, the Arañas bones
were not painted red nor placed on a prepared surface of ocher.
The once neatly stacked bones in Las Arañas had also been disturbed
and were cemented by calcite in the places where they had been scattered
[Figure 3]. Because of the time required for the calcite to form,
it appears certain that the ossuary was looted in antiquity and
this may account for the fact that only a few shell beads and a
fragment of a marble vessel were found associated with the burials.
A radiocarbon date run on charcoal at the entrance to the ossuary
chamber gave a date of 915 B.C. [Beta 95367; 2790 +/- 100 years
B.P.; calibrated one sigma results: 825-1030 B.C.] suggesting that
the Arañas ossuary is contemporaneous with the Cueva del Río Talgua
burials. There is no firm evidence for the date of the ossuary's
looting but we speculate that it may have occurred in the Late Classic,
some 1500-1700 years after the initial deposition.
The Cueva de Piedra Blanca, located
near the top of the mountain overlooking the town of Catacamas,
was investigated during the 1995 season. The cave is small, no more
than 50 m, but almost vertical with a small passage winding through
large chucks of collapsed rock. Near the bottom of the cave there
are at least ten deposits of human bone so the cave clearly functioned
as an ossuary. The bone was heavily disturbed and two skulls, which
had been deeply embedded in calcite, had been broken during the
attempt to remove them. Our guide said that a relative of his had
taken an intact vessel from the cave indicating that other archaeological
material had been present at one point.
The discovery of the Cueva de las
Arañas and the Cueva de Piedra Blanca are important because, to
this point, only a few ossuary caves have been reported and these
are widely distributed across Honduras.
Archaeologists have, therefore, considered them to be rather rare.
With the investigation of the Cueva del Río Talgua in 1994, the
Cueva de Piedra Blanca in 1995, and the Cueva de las Arañas in 1996,
the Talgua Archaeological Project has documented three ossuary caves
in a small area and has information on a number of others. There
can be little doubt, therefore, that the inhabitants living nearby
were using a number of ossuary caves. By simple arithmetic it is
clear, therefore, that each ossuary must have served a social unit
smaller than a single village. Since most traditional societies
are organized on the basis of kinship it seems reasonable to expect
that these smaller units were clans or lineages. Perrin (1996:421)
sees this type of grouping of the dead as an expression of a "very
Amerindian concept of ancestrality." This would tend to support
the suggestion that the Talgua Cave was a lineage burial cave similar
to those in the Maya area used up to the beginning of this century
(Brady 1997).
The discovery of multiple ossuaries
has additional implications. We see no reason to suspect that the
Talgua region differs from others in the use of ossuaries so it
is likely that large numbers of ossuaries are to be found in all
parts of Honduras. A recent listing of Honduran caves provides an
indication of the enormous quantity of unexplored sites available
(Hawkins and McKenzie 1993). The investigation of the three ossuaries
also permits us to see regularities in the type of cave context
selected for the ossuaries. Although each is different from the
others, the chambers are all in hidden, difficult to reach locations
in the deepest parts of their caves. In cave studies, it is generally
recognized that the selection of deep, hard to reach locations is
a marker of ceremonial utilization.
Finally, it should be noted that four
of the five radiocarbon dates from the ossuary contexts and all
of the ossuary ceramics argue for a Early to Middle Formative date
for cave ossuaries in this region. The cave ossuaries in Copan (Gordon
1898; Rue et al. 1989) and Cuyamel (Healy 1974) have also yielded
early ceramics although it must be recognized that there is no direct
dating of the skeletal material from these sites and serious reservations
have been expressed about the dating of the Gordon's Cave osuary
(Brady 1995). Nevertheless, recent data indicate that cave ossuary
burial may have been widely practiced over a large area covering
all of Honduras and perhaps the southern Maya lowlands (Bonor 1995;
Bonor and Martinez 1995; Brady et al. 1997) early in the Formative.
The practice seems to disappear by or before the Late Formative.
|
| |
| Cave Art |
| The
walls of the Cueva de las Arañas' small entrance chamber were one
covered with red and black paintings. Only remnants of these now survive
in areas where rock overhangs protected them from the elements. To
reach the ossuary and the tunnel system from the entrance, one must
pass through a crawlspace so low that several of the project members
were unable to negotiate it. Near the entrance to this opening is
a well preserved ladder-like painting. Immediately inside there are
three additional well persevered black paintings. Two are large, dramatic
faces which do not look particularly human [Figures 4 and 5]. The
third is a second ladder-shaped geometric design [Figure 6]. After
the discovery of the rock art in the Cueva de las Arañas, the entrance
to the burial chamber in the Cueva del Río Talgua was rechecked and
very faint drawings were noted there as well.. The presence of the
paintings at the entrances to the ossuary chambers appear to be marking
the boundaries of this sacred space and probably deal with themes
of death and afterlife. |
| |
| Surface
Settlement |
Excavations
conducted at the nearby surface site, called the Talgua Village (Site
OL 33), have radically changed our view of settlement in the area.
The village site, located on a terrace overlooking the Talgua River
approximately 3 km downstream from the Talgua caves [Figure 7], was
originally thought to date to the same period as the ossuary (800-1000
B.C.). This would have made it the largest Middle Formative settlement
in Honduras. Based on the perceived importance, the mounds were mapped
in 1994 by George Hasemann of IHAH and Christopher Begley of the University
of Chicago. The village's more than 80 mounds are arranged formally
around several plazas [Figure 8]. The largest mounds are around 2.5
meters high, with most measuring a meter or less. A settlement survey
cconducted by Boyd Dixon in 1995 of the Talgua River drainage confirmed
that the village was largest nucleated settlement along the river
(Dixon et al. 1998).
During the 1995 season, a shovel test-pitting
project, directed by Hasemann, encountered a hearth and recovered
several carbon samples. Two samples submitted for radiocarbon analysis
by the senior author yielded dates of 1250 +/- 50 B.P. [Beta 85277;
calibrated date of A.D. 780; calibrated one sigma results: A.D. 695-865]
and 1160 +/- 140 B.P. [Beta 85278; calibrated date of A.D. 885; calibrated
one sigma results: A.D. 695-1015]. Thus, the village appears to be
some 1500 years later in time than the ossuary. A more intensive investigation
was carried out by Begley in 1996. Excavations were designed to retrieve
information about intrasite variation, occupation sequence, and to
check details of particular architectural features. |
| |
| Geophysical
Prospection |
To
maximize limited time and resources, archaeological work was carried
out in conjunction with geophysicists and geophysical engineers. Portions
of the site were surveyed using magnetic, electrical, and seismic
geophysical techniques. Donald Stierman from the University of Toledo
conducted
surveys using a proton precession magnetometer and electrical resistivity
apparatus (Stierman and Brady 1999). A team from the University of
Nevada-Las Vegas, led by Barbara Luke, of the Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering, applied electrical resistivity and
a non-traditional seismic technique using seismic surface waves to
search for archaeological features (Luke et al. 1997).
The Toledo team conducted reconnaissance
at Talgua Village and at Chichicaste in July of 1995. Magnetometer
data were collected along four 60-meter profiles spaced 2 meters apart,
with station spacings of 1 meter and sensors set at 80 cm and 320
cm heights. Electrical resistivity reconnaissance at Talgua involved
a series of Lee partitioning array (Parasnis 1975) readings, across
mounds and plazas, along an east-west profile beginning 4 meters north
of the site datum. This electrode geometry was selected because it
has proven useful in identifying shallow air-filled voids in limestone
of northwest Ohio (Chaffee et al. 1994). One anomaly was further examined
using Schlumberger soundings. This is the location excavated to 50
cm depth. Subsequent analysis showed that the variation in subsurface
conditions occurred between 0.5 and 2.0 meters depth. Analysis of
magnetometer results also provided information useful in improving
the signal/noise ratio during later field work.
In June of 1996, two rectangular areas
and 3 profiles were surveyed with the magnetometer, this time in the
gradiometer configuration with sensors set 80 cm and 160 cm above
the ground. One survey block measured 20 meters
east-west and 50 meters north-south, with measurements taken at one
meter spacings along profiles 1 meter apart. This block covered a
plaza in the northwest corner of the site. A second survey block 10
m east-west and 40 m north-south (1 meter station spacing along profiles
1 meter apart) crossed several small mounds west and south of the
site datum. Data were collected along several additional profiles,
some to measure the geophysical signatures of known features and others
to characterize parts of the site that could not be covered in detail
during this field campaign.
The dipole-dipole array, selected as an optimum
strategy in view of measurements made during reconnaissance in 1995,
was used to measure variation in electrical resistivity along 4 profiles,
restricted to plazas and some very low rises, between 20 and 40 meters
in length. A combination of "a" spacing = 1 meter and dipole separations
from n = 1 to n = 6 provided good resolution of lateral and vertical
variations to an effective depth of 2 meters.
The UNLV team explored some 370 linear meters
in seven arrays, using both resistivity and seismic methods. The arrays
were positioned to traverse three adjoining mounds of different sizes.
Equipment was configured to target depths of 1-2 m.
Electrical resistivity measurements were
conducted using the standard Wenner array, with the Lee modification
(e.g. Burger 1992). These measurements are sensitive to the tendency
of the earth to transmit electricity, which will vary, for example,
with changing soil moisture. Abrupt changes in soil resistivity over
a short distance might be caused by buried archaeological features.
Seismic surface wave measurements were conducted
in an adaptation of the Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves, or SASW,
method which is well known in geotechnical engineering (e.g. Stokoe
et al. 1994). These measurements respond to variations in soil stiffness
in shear. Significant stiffness contrasts will exist, for example,
between soft saturated soil and rock buried beneath it. The technique
involves a pair of ground motion transducers connected to a dynamic
signal analyzer, which has the capability of performing frequency-domain
transformations and calculations in real time. In this measurement,
the transducer pair is placed on the ground surface and a stress wave
is generated a prescribed distance away. For anomaly detection, the
difference in phase of the response between the two transducers was
compared for source energy traveling in opposing directions. Anomalies
were indicated by distinct differences in phase over appropriate frequency
ranges.
The seismic and electrical surveys netted
some 25 notable anomalies, which were then ranked for potential archaeological
significance. Points where electrical and seismic anomalies coincided
were of particular interest. Several of the more promising anomalies
were targeted for excavation. |
| |
| Archaeological
Excavations |
|
Archaeological work
at the Talgua Village commenced in 1996 with a series of shovel
probes, designed to located areas of high artifact density. Previous
fieldwork in eastern Honduras (Begley 1995) has demonstrated that
even large sites often exhibit extremely low artifact densities,
making the initial probes necessary and valuable. Following the
probes, excavation units were selected based primarily on anomalies
identified by Luke and Stierman.
One geophysical anomaly was located
at the base of a small mound at the edge of the main plaza. The
homogenous clay mound fill, excavated to a depth of 80 cm, contained
large quantities of ceramics. At about 70 cm, just above the termination
of the clay layer, a discrete area demarked by a layer of round
flat pebbles of uniform size (about 5 to 7 cm in diameter) was encountered.
On removal, this layer of rocks was found to cover a burial. The
remains, excavated by Nick Herrmann from the University of Tennessee,
were identified as those of a female over 30 years of age. The burial
was partly disarticulated and no grave offering were encountered.
The outlines of the original burial pit could not be detected, although
it probably coincided with the horizontal dimensions of the layer
of flat pebbles which was approximately 1 m x 1.3 m and about 30
cm deep.
An anomaly near the top of the tallest
(slightly more than two meters high) mound at the site led to the
discovery of a stone monument. This piece is noteworthy in being
one of the few monuments from eastern Honduras for which there are
solid contextual data. The monument, recovered from the southeast
corner of the excavation, is a fine-grained, green stone, measuring
56 by 83 cm and weighing about 250 lbs. The rock is probably a hydrothermally
altered volcanic rock and the primary green mineral appears to be
epidote. Given the symbolic significance of green stone throughout
Mesoamerica and lower Central America, one must suspect that the
stone had been selected for its green color. This boulder is rounded
to well rounded and was probably carried from the nearby Talgua
River, where a cobble of similar composition was collected in 1996.
One end was broken off, forming a flat side, and chisel marks visible
along that edge show that this modification was deliberate. A crude
face has been formed by the grinding of three cupuals and augmented
by several pecked valutes [Figure 9]. This monument appears to have
stood vertically, as a sort of stela, adorning the tallest structure
and possibly facing into the central plaza. A slab of quartz-rich
metaconglomerate about one meter square is exposed at the crest
of this mound. It appears likely that this stone, also unique among
rocks examined thus far at Talgua village, served as the base upon
which the monument was erected.
Excavations associated with the discovery
of this monument also revealed a 40 cm thick strata of homogenous
orange clay overlying a layer of river cobbles. These cobbles seem
to be remains of a veneer which originally surfaced at least part
of the mound. The soil overlaying the cobbles is probably mound
fill washed from the summit. Three additional test units found that
a nearby anomaly was corrolated with a cobble pavement along the
side of this mound. This pavement may represent a ramp centrally
located on the east side of the mound, or may be part of a more
extensive facing.
The one strongly magnetic anomaly (Stierman
1996) was due to a large fire-pit located near the base of another
large mound. Upon excavation of approximately half the feature,
which measured 170 cm in diameter, the pit was found to be filled
with broken rock and contained animal bones and ceramics. Burnt
clay from this feature was tested and found to exhibit a magnetic
susceptibility approximately 10 times that of the surrounding lateritic
soil. It was not determined if this feature was prehistoric.
The most interesting anomalies were not
initially recognized as significant. In two places in the main plaza,
excavations investigated electrical resistivity anomalies. The first
of these was located in 1995 by Stierman and excavated at that time
to a depth of 45 cm. That excavation was halted when a layer of
river pebbles was encountered underlying the topsoil and overlying
apparently sterile base clay. The structure responsible for this
anomaly was located at a depth of two meters, so the feature was
assumed to be geological in nature. After the initial radiocarbon
dates for the village, indicated an occupation around A.D. 800,
the decision was made to excavate to the source of the anomaly in
the hopes that it represented a feature associated with the Middle
Formative settlement which may have been covered by repeated flooding
of the Talgua River.
When the excavations were opened in 1996,
the first indication that our entire thinking about the site might
be flawed came with the discovery of a probable hearth accompanied
by sherds at a depth of nearly a meter and a half. Further excavation
revealed an occasional sherd mixed in among the stones. It became
clear that this mixture of sand, silt and rocks was not naturally
deposited but rather represented imported fill. These small cobbles
are unsorted and do not exhibit imbrication
characteristic of a fluvial deposit. The anomalous readings in the
plaza might be explained by the contrast between electrically resistive
stone fill and the less resistive natural soils marking the original
ground surface. The entire plaza, an area at least 1000 meters square
and probably much larger, had been filled to a depth of over two
meters with stones carried from river.
Of all the information gathered during
the 1996 excavations, this is by far the most potentially significant,
with important ramifications for our identification of labor input
at a site. One of the primary correlates for the identification
of complex social organization is public or monumental construction,
general defined as "organized productive activities which transcend
the basic household group...One is the construction of monuments
which, because of their size and complexity, require both planning
and a large labor force" (Peebles and Kus 1977: 432). In Mesoamerica
and its periphery, this is normally thought of in terms of visible
architecture. At the Talgua Village, a great input of labor was
expended on an activity that left no surface trace, and which would
have been missed without excavation. In fact, had the decision not
been made to excavate to the depth of the anomaly, in this case
over two meters, it is unlikely that the artificial nature of the
plaza would have been discovered. This may be the most promising
area in which geophysical measurements could be utilized. If artificial
fill is characterized by geophysical signatures clearly distinct
from those of naturally developed soils, its lateral and vertical
extent can be mapped in a relatively rapid and non-invasive manner.
This may enable us to remotely identify filled areas, allowing these
invisible public works to become accessible.
An analysis of the village ceramics suggests
a Period V (Late Classic) date consistent with the radiocarbon determinations.
Ceramics of the 'Chalky' group, first defined by Healy (1993) near
Trujillo, account for approximately 10 % of the assemblage from
the excavations, and have been dated to the Late Classic period
there and elsewhere in the region (Begley 1995). Polychromes, similar
to types identified at Chichicaste, Olancho, were present in small
quantities, also dated to the Late Classic (Gómez 1995; Beaudry-Corbett
et al. 1997). A single small sherd of Ulua Polychrome, Contador
type, Red Group, was identified, reinforcing this date. The lack
of incised ceramics such as the Abstracted Scroll type prevalent
in Early Period VI (Postclassic) sites in eastern Honduras suggests
an end to the occupation of Site OL 33 prior to 900 AD.
Evidence of complex social organization
has been reported for eastern Honduras, possibly as early as AD
300 but certainly by AD 550-600 (Begley 1992, Healy 1992: 90). This
period of increasing complexity continued at least until early Period
VI, or the early Postclassic. Excavation to sterile soil in several
parts of the Talgua Village indicate a single occupation late in
Period V (Late Classic). The date of AD 600-900 for the site ,
therefore, corresponds to the beginning of the fluorescence of complex
societies in this region. Although the mounds at Talgua Village
are not massive, the settlement is fairly large for the area and
represents a large nucleation of population. Architecturally, evidence
of cobble-covered structures topped with superstructures of bajareque,
or wattle and daub, are consistent with that observed throughout
eastern Honduras (Begley 1995). The mounds appear to have been constructed
with sloping sides, at least part of which were paved with cobbles.
It is also interesting that there is no evidence at Talgua Village
of stepped mounds with vertical retaining walls as these are common
throughout central and western Honduras. Perhaps because of the
limited nature of our testing, no evidence for significant intrasite
variability in any aspect of material culture was found.
|
| |
| CONCLUSIONS
|
The
Talgua Archaeological Project was formed to investigate an Early/Middle
Formative cave ossuary reported to the Instituto Hondureño de Antropología
e Historia in 1994. The study was expanded to include what was thought
to be a contemporaneous occupation site and several additional cave
sites in the area. The results of the work have implications for our
understanding of the immediate area and wider issues in Honduran archaeology.
The investigation of three cave ossuaries
in a relatively small area has been instrumental in clarifying a number
of issues concerning this poorly understood cultural form. First,
it permits us to underscore an observation made by Doris Stone (1957:56)
more than forty years ago that a pattern of cave burial is widely
distributed in the country. In addition to the ossuaries reported
by Gordon (1898) in Copan and Healy (1974) in Cuyamel, Stone mentions
burials in the caves at Guapinole (1957:56), El Sitio (1957: 53-54),
Guanizale (1957:112), and the Cave of the Devil (1957:113). Second,
while both Gordon's Cave #3 at Copan and the Cuyamel Caves have produced
Early/Middle Formative ceramics, the Talgua ossuaries are the first
that have provided solid radiometric dating of the ossuaries. Although
the data are very limited we are tentatively advancing the idea that
cave ossuary burial is an Early to Middle Formative trait that disappears
by the Late Formative. Clearly what is needed is a restudy and dating
of the Copan and Cuyamel ossuaries. Third, the discovery of three
ossuaries in a relatively restricted area also suggests that the form
was far more common than the few reported examples would lead us to
believe. If additional study does show that cave ossuary burial is
an Early/Middle Formative trait, it would vastly expand our evidence
for this early period in Honduras.
The investigations at the Talgua Village
site, utilizing geophysical prospection techniques, uncovered an array
of architectural enhancements to surface architecture. First, and
most importantly, the construction of a huge artificial terrace for
the architure demonstrates that the site is far more of a "built"
environment than previously believed. Second, the limited data suggest
that pavement with riverine cobbles may be quite extensive within
sites. Finally, the discovery of a stone monument provides a solid
archaeological context for analyzing the nature and role of this art
work. The recovery of the monument at a relatively small site is somewhat
surprising and suggests that such monuments may be a standard feature
of sites in this area.
The findings also underscore the nascent
stage of our understanding of how to approach sociopolitical complexity
from an archaeological perspective. The virtually invisible labor
investment represented by the plaza fill forces a reexamination of
our assessme nt
of sites based on visible monumental construction alone. Labor on
a large scale was clearly being mobilized but the uses or concerns
to which it was being put differed from those in polities to the west.
Very importantly, it must be remembered that the limited investigation
at the Talgua Village, nevertheless, represents the most archaeological
excavation carried out in east-central Honduras. In all likelihood,
further work will find these sites to be more sophisticated and more
complex than we now imagine.
Assumptions about the ways in which material
culture relates to complexity is also problematized by the cave materials.
Sumptuary goods, including items like marble vessels which certainly
required incredible labor investment, were associated with individuals
dating from the Early/Middle Formative. Unfortunately, we have no
evidence of occupation, much less evidence of a complex sociopolitical
organization, from this period in eastern Honduras. A major disappointment
of the Talgua Archaeological Project was its failure to find habitational
data associated chronologically with the cave ossuaries. It may be
that the sites are located along the river bottoms and are deeply
buried by alluvial muds as they sometimes are in riverine environments
in the Southeastern United States. Future research in the area needs
to focus on the location of Formative Period settlements, the nature
of which may shed light not only on the enigmatic cave materials but
also on the assessment of sociopolitical complexity through material
culture.
Acknowledgments: The project's 1996 season was made possible
by a generous grant from Dole-Standard Fruit which was arranged by
Laurence August, CEO of Geoventures, Inc. The sponsorship of Nissan
Pathfinder was critical to the success of all three expeditions from
1994-1996. The authors would like to thank Dra. Olga Joya Sierra,
director of the Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia for
her support the project. Dr. George Hasemann has been an integral
part of the project from its inception and has guided both the field
program and the interpretation. Special thanks is due Pastor Gómez
who worked as an archaeologist on the project and has helped in innumerable
ways in the excavation and analysis. |
|